Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
🥇 +5 | jujutoto | 52 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
🥈 +3 | jenj | 52 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
🥉 +8 | joebar83 | 52 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
4 +7 | yenmimi | 52 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
5 = | cazin | 45 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
6 +1 | jasmine | 44 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
7 +2 | yannthomas | 44 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
8 −1 | louisou | 41 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
9 +4 | hedihu | 41 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
10 +2 | LeChe35 | 41 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
11 +1 | MaxBIAGGI3 | 40 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
12 = | Tm | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
13 = | zrx1100 | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
14 = | cevennol | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
15 +1 | Nistic | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
16 +2 | nofoott50 | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
17 −2 | JMi | 38 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
18 −1 | Mouette | 38 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
19 = | Taz83340 | 38 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
20 −1 | pinkie | 37 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
21 −2 | carat | 36 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
22 +4 | dess72 | 36 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
23 −1 | funset | 36 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
24 = | desmolo | 36 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
25 −1 | ptirossi24 | 36 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
26 = | touf | 32 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
27 −3 | Greg125 | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
28 −3 | NIOBE49 | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
29 −2 | tips | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
30 +1 | Lav | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
31 +1 | Bozot74 | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
32 −4 | gbe05 | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
🥕 +2 | ben29 | 20 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.