Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
🥇 = | Taz83340 | 45 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
🥈 +4 | solene74 | 45 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
🥉 +5 | yannthomas | 45 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
4 +3 | tips | 40 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
5 +1 | ben29 | 40 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
6 +4 | jujutoto | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
7 +4 | nofoott50 | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
8 +3 | JMi | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
9 +4 | Greg125 | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
10 +4 | carat | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
11 +2 | jenj | 35 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (12) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
12 +3 | louisou | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
13 +1 | Bozot74 | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
14 +4 | LeChe35 | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
15 = | zrx1100 | 32 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
16 = | Lav | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
17 +2 | pat42 | 32 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
18 = | hedihu | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
19 +1 | Nistic | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
20 +1 | cevennol | 32 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
21 = | loris46 | 32 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Shaun Simpson (24) |
22 = | desmolo | 32 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
23 = | MaxBIAGGI3 | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
24 = | jasmine | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
25 −1 | yenmimi | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
26 = | pinkie | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
27 = | funset | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
28 +1 | gbe05 | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
29 −2 | NIOBE49 | 25 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
30 −3 | Tm | 25 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
31 −4 | Mouette | 24 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
32 +1 | cazin | 22 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (12) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
33 −4 | dess72 | 20 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Jordi Tixier (911) |
🥕 +1 | touf | 18 points 1. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.