Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
| Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
| 🥇 | Taz83340 | 45 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
| 🥈 +4▲ | solene74 | 45 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
| 🥉 +5▲ | yannthomas | 45 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
| 4 +3▲ | tips | 40 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 5 +1▲ | ben29 | 40 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 6 +4▲ | jujutoto | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 7 +4▲ | nofoott50 | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 8 +3▲ | JMi | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 9 +4▲ | Greg125 | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 10 +4▲ | carat | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 11 +2▲ | jenj | 35 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (12) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
| 12 +3▲ | louisou | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 13 +1▲ | Bozot74 | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 14 +4▲ | LeChe35 | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 15 | zrx1100 | 32 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 16 | Lav | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 17 +2▲ | pat42 | 32 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 18 | hedihu | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 19 +1▲ | Nistic | 32 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 20 +1▲ | cevennol | 32 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 21 | loris46 | 32 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Shaun Simpson (24) |
| 22 | desmolo | 32 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 23 | MaxBIAGGI3 | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 24 | jasmine | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
| 25 −1▼ | yenmimi | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
| 26 | pinkie | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 27 | funset | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 28 +1▲ | gbe05 | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 29 −2▼ | NIOBE49 | 25 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
| 30 −3▼ | Tm | 25 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
| 31 −4▼ | Mouette | 24 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 32 +1▲ | cazin | 22 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (12) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 33 −4▼ | dess72 | 20 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Jordi Tixier (911) |
| 💥 +1▲ | touf | 18 points 1. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.