Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
🥇 +8 | JMi | 47 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
🥈 +1 | desmolo | 47 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
🥉 +2 | louisou | 43 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
4 = | Taz83340 | 43 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
5 +1 | ptirossi24 | 43 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
6 +5 | tips | 41 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
7 +3 | gbe05 | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
8 +3 | Greg125 | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
9 +7 | pinkie | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
10 +7 | Tm | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
11 −1 | jasmine | 38 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
12 +1 | Lav | 37 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Shaun Simpson (24) |
13 +1 | jenj | 35 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
14 −3 | joebar83 | 35 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
15 −2 | cevennol | 35 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
16 −1 | ppda | 34 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
17 −1 | Mouette | 34 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
18 +1 | jujutoto | 33 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
19 −2 | yenmimi | 33 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
20 = | carat | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
21 +2 | ben29 | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
22 = | MaxBIAGGI3 | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
23 +2 | mbm | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
24 −2 | nofoott50 | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
25 −5 | Nistic | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
26 −1 | yannthomas | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
27 −3 | zrx1100 | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
28 −3 | funset | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
29 −5 | hedihu | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
30 −4 | LeChe35 | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
31 −5 | pat42 | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
32 −5 | NIOBE49 | 27 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Tommy Searle (100) |
33 = | Pistar39 | 25 points 1. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
34 +5 | touf | 23 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Milko Potisek (32) |
🥕 +1 | cazin | 20 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.