Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
| Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
| 🥇 +8▲ | JMi | 47 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
| 🥈 +1▲ | desmolo | 47 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
| 🥉 +2▲ | louisou | 43 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 4 | Taz83340 | 43 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 5 +1▲ | ptirossi24 | 43 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 6 +5▲ | tips | 41 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 7 +3▲ | gbe05 | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 8 +3▲ | Greg125 | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 9 +7▲ | pinkie | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 10 +7▲ | Tm | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 11 −1▼ | jasmine | 38 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
| 12 +1▲ | Lav | 37 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Shaun Simpson (24) |
| 13 +1▲ | jenj | 35 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 14 −3▼ | joebar83 | 35 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 15 −2▼ | cevennol | 35 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 16 −1▼ | ppda | 34 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 17 −1▼ | Mouette | 34 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
| 18 +1▲ | jujutoto | 33 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 19 −2▼ | yenmimi | 33 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
| 20 | carat | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 21 +2▲ | ben29 | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
| 22 | MaxBIAGGI3 | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 23 +2▲ | mbm | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 24 −2▼ | nofoott50 | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 25 −5▼ | Nistic | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 26 −1▼ | yannthomas | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 27 −3▼ | zrx1100 | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 28 −3▼ | funset | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 29 −5▼ | hedihu | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
| 30 −4▼ | LeChe35 | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 31 −5▼ | pat42 | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
| 32 −5▼ | NIOBE49 | 27 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Tommy Searle (100) |
| 33 | Pistar39 | 25 points 1. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 34 +5▲ | touf | 23 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Milko Potisek (32) |
| 💥 +1▲ | cazin | 20 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.