Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
🥇 +7 | jasmine | 45 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
🥈 +4 | louisou | 42 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
🥉 = | dess72 | 42 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
4 +1 | cazin | 42 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
5 +9 | pat42 | 42 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
6 +2 | MaxBIAGGI3 | 39 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
7 +1 | joebar83 | 39 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
8 +3 | tips | 38 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
9 +1 | jujutoto | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
10 = | desmolo | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
11 = | Taz83340 | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
12 +3 | JMi | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
13 +1 | ptirossi24 | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
14 +4 | hedihu | 37 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
15 +2 | jenj | 35 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
16 = | Tm | 34 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (12) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
17 = | pinkie | 34 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
18 = | carat | 34 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
19 = | zrx1100 | 34 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
20 = | funset | 34 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
21 +1 | yenmimi | 34 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
22 −1 | yannthomas | 34 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
23 +6 | Bozot74 | 34 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (12) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
24 +7 | loris46 | 34 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
25 | solene74 | 32 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
26 = | Pistar39 | 30 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
27 −1 | Lav | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Shaun Simpson (24) |
28 −3 | cevennol | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
29 −3 | Mouette | 30 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
30 −1 | LeChe35 | 29 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
31 −6 | ppda | 26 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
32 −5 | Greg125 | 26 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
33 −5 | gbe05 | 26 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
34 −6 | nofoott50 | 26 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
35 −3 | Nistic | 26 points 1. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Tim Gajser (243) |
36 −4 | NIOBE49 | 26 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
🥕 −2 | ben29 | 1 points 1. Clement Desalle (25) 2. Jordi Tixier (911) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.