Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
🥇 = | joebar83 | 35 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
🥈 +3 | hedihu | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
🥉 +2 | tips | 30 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
4 = | Mouette | 26 points 1. Clement Desalle (25) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
5 +1 | funset | 26 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Shaun Simpson (24) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
6 = | louisou | 25 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Maximilian Nagl (12) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
7 = | jasmine | 23 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
8 = | Taz83340 | 23 points 1. Clement Desalle (25) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
9 +1 | jenj | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
10 +2 | yenmimi | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
11 +1 | pat42 | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
12 +1 | LeChe35 | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) |
13 = | NIOBE49 | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
14 +2 | Nistic | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
15 −1 | ptirossi24 | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
16 −1 | JMi | 21 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
17 = | Greg125 | 20 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
18 −1 | gbe05 | 20 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
19 = | desmolo | 20 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
20 = | pinkie | 20 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
21 −1 | nofoott50 | 20 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
22 +1 | cevennol | 20 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Maximilian Nagl (12) |
23 −2 | Lav | 18 points 1. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
24 +1 | loris46 | 15 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
25 +1 | touf | 13 points 1. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Romain Febvre (461) |
26 +1 | dess72 | 12 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Jordi Tixier (911) |
27 −4 | jujutoto | 11 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
28 = | yannthomas | 11 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
29 −2 | Tm | 11 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Romain Febvre (461) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
30 −4 | carat | 10 points 1. Tim Gajser (243) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777) |
🥕 +1 | MaxBIAGGI3 | 8 points 1. Romain Febvre (461) 2. Tim Gajser (243) 3. Jordi Tixier (911) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.