Motocross MXGP 2016 Italie, Mantova

Résultats

Course disputée .

  1. SLO Tim Gajser (243) − Honda
  2. FRA Gautier Paulin (21) − Honda
  3. BEL Clement Desalle (25) − Kawasaki
  4. ITA Antonio Cairoli (222) − KTM
  5. BEL Jeremy Van Horebeek (89) − Yamaha
  6. NED Glenn Coldenhoff (259) − KTM
  7. RUS Evgeny Bobryshev (777) − Honda
  8. SUI Valentin Guillod (92) − Yamaha
  9. ESP Jose Butron (17) − KTM
  10. GER Maximilian Nagl (12) − Husqvarna

Résultats des pronostics

Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.

RangJoueurPronostic
🥇
+5 		joebar8347 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Gautier Paulin (21)
3. Antonio Cairoli (222)
🥈
+1 		jujutoto42 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Antonio Cairoli (222)
3. Gautier Paulin (21)
🥉
+3 		MaxBIAGGI342 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Antonio Cairoli (222)
3. Gautier Paulin (21)
4
+2 		jenj42 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Antonio Cairoli (222)
3. Gautier Paulin (21)
5
=		nofoott5038 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Gautier Paulin (21)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
6
=		desmolo36 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Gautier Paulin (21)
7
+2 		hedihu36 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Gautier Paulin (21)
8
+2 		LeChe3534 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Antonio Cairoli (222)
9
−1 		ptirossi2432 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89)
10
+2 		funset31 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Antonio Cairoli (222)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
11
+1 		yenmimi31 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Antonio Cairoli (222)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
12
−1 		gbe0530 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Romain Febvre (461)
3. Antonio Cairoli (222)
13
−1 		zrx110030 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Romain Febvre (461)
3. Antonio Cairoli (222)
14
+1 		Mouette28 points

1. Gautier Paulin (21)
2. Tim Gajser (243)
3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
15
+2 		dess7225 points

1. Clement Desalle (25)
2. Tim Gajser (243)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
16
+1 		NIOBE4925 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
17
−1 		Tm25 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
18
−1 		jasmine25 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Maximilian Nagl (12)
3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
19
=		louisou25 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
20
+1 		Lav25 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
21
−1 		Taz8334025 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
22
−1 		JMi25 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
23
+1 		pat4225 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
24
+1 		pinkie23 points

1. Antonio Cairoli (222)
2. Tim Gajser (243)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
25
=		cazin23 points

1. Antonio Cairoli (222)
2. Maximilian Nagl (12)
3. Gautier Paulin (21)
26
=		Ben712522 points

1. Antonio Cairoli (222)
2. Romain Febvre (461)
3. Tim Gajser (243)
27
−4 		Greg12522 points

1. Antonio Cairoli (222)
2. Tim Gajser (243)
3. Romain Febvre (461)
28
=		touf21 points

1. Maximilian Nagl (12)
2. Tim Gajser (243)
3. Jeremy Van Horebeek (89)
29
−2 		yannthomas21 points

1. Tim Gajser (243)
2. Maximilian Nagl (12)
3. Romain Febvre (461)
30
=		ben2917 points

1. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
2. Tim Gajser (243)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
31
−3 		cevennol17 points

1. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
2. Tim Gajser (243)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
32
−2 		tips17 points

1. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
2. Tim Gajser (243)
3. Maximilian Nagl (12)
33
−2 		carat16 points

1. Romain Febvre (461)
2. Tim Gajser (243)
3. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
34
−4 		Nistic16 points

1. Gautier Paulin (21)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Tommy Searle (100)
35
=		solene7416 points

1. Antonio Cairoli (222)
2. Evgeny Bobryshev (777)
3. Jose Butron (17)
36
=		loris4614 points

1. Antonio Cairoli (222)
2. Maximilian Nagl (12)
3. Valentin Guillod (92)
🥕
=		Bozot7413 points

1. Romain Febvre (461)
2. Maximilian Nagl (12)
3. Tim Gajser (243)

Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.