Motocross MX2 2014 Bulgarie à Sevlievo

Résultats

Course disputée .

  1. NED Jeffrey Herlings (84) − KTM
  2. SUI Arnaud Tonus (200) − Kawasaki
  3. FRA Jordi Tixier (911) − KTM
  4. FRA Dylan Ferrandis (122) − Kawasaki
  5. FRA Romain Febvre (461) − Husqvarna
  6. BUL Petar Petrov (152) − Yamaha
  7. NED Glenn Coldenhoff (259) − Suzuki
  8. SLO Tim Gajser (243) − Honda
  9. RUS Aleksandr Tonkov (59) − Husqvarna
  10. SUI Jeremy Seewer (91) − Suzuki

Résultats des pronostics

Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.

RangJoueurPronostic
🥇
mbm52 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Jordi Tixier (911)
🥈
+3▲		JMi52 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Jordi Tixier (911)
🥉
+2▲		cazin52 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Jordi Tixier (911)
4
+3▲		solene7452 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Jordi Tixier (911)
5
+4▲		yenmimi47 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Dylan Ferrandis (122)
6
+4▲		yaya8545 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Romain Febvre (461)
7
funset45 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Romain Febvre (461)
8
+5▲		pat4245 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Romain Febvre (461)
9
+3▲		NIOBE4945 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Romain Febvre (461)
10
+3▲		ppda45 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Romain Febvre (461)
11
+3▲		cevennol45 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Romain Febvre (461)
12
endurance45 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Romain Febvre (461)
13
+2▲		MaxBIAGGI344 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Jordi Tixier (911)
3. Arnaud Tonus (200)
14
+2▲		guildel43 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Romain Febvre (461)
3. Jordi Tixier (911)
15
+4▲		dess7243 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Romain Febvre (461)
3. Jordi Tixier (911)
16
+1▲		joebar8342 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Dylan Ferrandis (122)
3. Arnaud Tonus (200)
17
louisou42 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Dylan Ferrandis (122)
3. Arnaud Tonus (200)
18
LeChe3541 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
19
Tm41 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
20
gbe0541 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
21
jasmine41 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Arnaud Tonus (200)
3. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
22
−1▼		Taz8334040 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Romain Febvre (461)
3. Arnaud Tonus (200)
23
−1▼		desmolo36 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
3. Arnaud Tonus (200)
24
jenj36 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
3. Arnaud Tonus (200)
25
−1▼		yannthomas36 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
3. Arnaud Tonus (200)
26
+1▲		Lav36 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
3. Arnaud Tonus (200)
27
motard9135 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Alessandro Lupino (8)
3. Jordi Tixier (911)
28
−2▼		carat34 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
3. Dylan Ferrandis (122)
29
−2▼		ben2934 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
3. Dylan Ferrandis (122)
30
−4▼		pinkie34 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
3. Dylan Ferrandis (122)
31
+4▲		ptirossi2432 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Romain Febvre (461)
3. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
32
+2▲		loulou9532 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Jordi Tixier (911)
3. Jose Butron (17)
33
−1▼		Greg12530 points

1. Dylan Ferrandis (122)
2. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
3. Romain Febvre (461)
34
−8▼		loris4624 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Valentin Guillod (92)
3. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
35
+2▲		laco-2721 points

1. Romain Febvre (461)
2. Jeremy Seewer (91)
3. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
36
−2▼		zrx110020 points

1. Jeffrey Herlings (84)
2. Alessandro Lupino (8)
3. Max Anstie (99)
💥
Cuissedamour14 points

1. Dylan Ferrandis (122)
2. Glenn Coldenhoff (259)
3. Harri Kullas (151)

Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.