Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
| Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
| 🥇 +6▲ | gunners | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 🥈 +3▲ | jasmine | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 🥉 +7▲ | vince300ec | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 4 | LeChe35 | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 5 +6▲ | Taz83340 | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 6 +5▲ | OTAGANIRE | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 7 +6▲ | cocomx | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 8 +6▲ | endurance | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 9 +1▲ | joebar83 | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 10 +2▲ | JMi | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 11 +6▲ | tofile | 52 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 12 −1▼ | desmolo | 44 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) |
| 13 +3▲ | yannthomas | 44 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) |
| 14 −1▼ | 123ladouille | 44 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) |
| 15 +7▲ | cevennol | 44 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) |
| 16 +3▲ | carat | 43 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Steven FROSSARD (183) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 17 +5▲ | furygane94 | 41 points 1. Ken ROCZEN (94) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) |
| 18 +1▲ | Tm | 40 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 19 +5▲ | CamisoleDeForce | 40 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 20 | banditof | 40 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 21 | NIOBE49 | 40 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 22 +2▲ | fallais | 40 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 23 | acerbis121 | 39 points 1. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 2. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 24 −3▼ | marmotte | 37 points 1. Steven FROSSARD (183) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) |
| 25 −4▼ | tips | 37 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Shaun SIMPSON (11) |
| 26 | ppda | 37 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Shaun SIMPSON (11) |
| 27 −1▼ | funset | 36 points 1. Ken ROCZEN (94) 2. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 3. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) |
| 28 +2▲ | fredorini | 36 points 1. Ken ROCZEN (94) 2. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 3. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) |
| 29 +3▲ | Lav | 36 points 1. Ken ROCZEN (94) 2. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 3. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) |
| 30 −7▼ | benben75 | 34 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Jeremy VAN HOREBEEK (89) |
| 31 | Le_Martien | 32 points 1. Ken ROCZEN (94) 2. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 32 −1▼ | pinkie | 32 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Edward ALLINGHAM (123) |
| 33 +2▲ | gex68 | 32 points 1. Ken ROCZEN (94) 2. Steven FROSSARD (183) 3. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) |
| 34 +1▲ | la-martienne | 32 points 1. Ken ROCZEN (94) 2. Steven FROSSARD (183) 3. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) |
| 35 −1▼ | MaxBIAGGI3 | 28 points 1. Ken ROCZEN (94) 2. Joel ROELANTS (34) 3. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) |
| 36 +2▲ | xj600n | 28 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Steven FROSSARD (183) 3. Shaun SIMPSON (11) |
| 37 +1▲ | zrx1100 | 28 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Nicolas AUBIN (131) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 38 | MJRBOSCO | 24 points 1. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Shaun SIMPSON (11) |
| 39 | kiqui34 | 20 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Marcus SCHIFFER (27) 3. Jake NICHOLLS (45) |
| 💥 | cazin | 20 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Gautier PAULIN (21) 3. Aleksandr TONKOV (310) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.