Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
| Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
| 🥇 +3▲ | pat42 | 38 points 1. Maximilian Nagl (12) 2. Kevin Strijbos (22) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
| 🥈 +3▲ | pinkie | 35 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 🥉 +2▲ | guildel | 35 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 4 +4▲ | Patrick42 | 35 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 5 +2▲ | cevennol | 30 points 1. Kevin Strijbos (22) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
| 6 | WHiteSoul | 29 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Clement Desalle (25) |
| 7 +2▲ | Tm | 29 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
| 8 +2▲ | LeChe35 | 29 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
| 9 | cazin | 29 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Ken de Dycker (9) |
| 10 | loris46 | 29 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Ken de Dycker (9) |
| 11 | nofoott50 | 29 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
| 12 | dess72 | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
| 13 +1▲ | loulou95 | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
| 14 | mbm | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
| 15 −1▼ | ben29 | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
| 16 +1▲ | funset | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
| 17 −1▼ | ppda | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Ken de Dycker (9) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
| 18 +1▲ | hedihu | 24 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Gautier Paulin (21) |
| 19 +1▲ | ptirossi24 | 23 points 1. Kevin Strijbos (22) 2. Gautier Paulin (21) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
| 20 −3▼ | JMi | 21 points 1. Kevin Strijbos (22) 2. Shaun Simpson (24) 3. Antonio Cairoli (222) |
| 21 | carat | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 22 +4▲ | joel_cbr | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Kevin Strijbos (22) 3. Ken de Dycker (9) |
| 23 −1▼ | MaxBIAGGI3 | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Kevin Strijbos (22) 3. Ken de Dycker (9) |
| 24 −2▼ | jenj | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Kevin Strijbos (22) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
| 25 −2▼ | gbe05 | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 26 | yannthomas | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Ken de Dycker (9) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 27 | laco-27 | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Kevin Strijbos (22) 3. Shaun Simpson (24) |
| 28 | solene74 | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Shaun Simpson (24) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 29 +1▲ | NIOBE49 | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 30 +1▲ | louisou | 18 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Kevin Strijbos (22) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
| 31 | jasmine | 18 points 1. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 32 −2▼ | yenmimi | 18 points 1. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 33 | desmolo | 18 points 1. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 2. Antonio Cairoli (222) 3. Kevin Strijbos (22) |
| 34 | Lav | 12 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Ken de Dycker (9) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
| 35 −1▼ | joebar83 | 12 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Ken de Dycker (9) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
| 36 | jujutoto | 12 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Shaun Simpson (24) |
| 37 −2▼ | zrx1100 | 12 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Clement Desalle (25) 3. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) |
| 💥 −1▼ | Taz83340 | 12 points 1. Antonio Cairoli (222) 2. Jeremy van Horebeek (89) 3. Shaun Simpson (24) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.