Course disputée .
Le classement du week-end toutes compétitions confondues.
| Rang | Joueur | Pronostic |
| 🥇 +5▲ | cevennol | 42 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Zach OSBORNE (338) 3. Shaun SIMPSON (11) |
| 🥈 +2▲ | gouz | 38 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Gautier PAULIN (21) 3. Zach OSBORNE (338) |
| 🥉 +3▲ | ppda | 36 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Steven FROSSARD (183) 3. Zach OSBORNE (338) |
| 4 +3▲ | vince300ec | 35 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Zach OSBORNE (338) |
| 5 +4▲ | kiqui34 | 32 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Zach OSBORNE (338) 3. Jake NICHOLLS (45) |
| 6 | Lav | 32 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Zach OSBORNE (338) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 7 +3▲ | banditof | 32 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Zach OSBORNE (338) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 8 +6▲ | NIOBE49 | 32 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Zach OSBORNE (338) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 9 +4▲ | OTAGANIRE | 32 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Zach OSBORNE (338) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 10 +4▲ | xj600n | 31 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Shaun SIMPSON (11) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 11 | la-martienne | 31 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Shaun SIMPSON (11) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 12 +1▲ | tips | 29 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 13 +3▲ | tofile | 29 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 14 +3▲ | Taz83340 | 29 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 15 | carat | 28 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 16 | joebar83 | 24 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Steven FROSSARD (183) 3. Gautier PAULIN (21) |
| 17 +1▲ | cocomx | 24 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Steven FROSSARD (183) 3. Gautier PAULIN (21) |
| 18 −1▼ | LeChe35 | 23 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Gautier PAULIN (21) |
| 19 | rostlud | 23 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Gautier PAULIN (21) 3. Deny PHILIPPAERTS (414) |
| 20 −2▼ | desmolo | 23 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Gautier PAULIN (21) |
| 21 +2▲ | benben75 | 23 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Jeremy VAN HOREBEEK (89) 3. Gautier PAULIN (21) |
| 22 −1▼ | Tm | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 23 −3▼ | jasmine | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 24 | CamisoleDeForce | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 25 +1▲ | Le_Martien | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 26 −1▼ | zrx1100 | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 27 | jmfournel | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 28 −2▼ | JMi | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 29 +1▲ | funset | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Steven FROSSARD (183) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 30 | pinkie | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 31 −4▼ | endurance | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 32 −1▼ | yannthomas | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 33 −1▼ | acerbis121 | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 34 −1▼ | gex68 | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 35 +2▲ | cazin | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Steven FROSSARD (183) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 36 −2▼ | 123ladouille | 21 points 1. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 2. Steven FROSSARD (183) 3. Ken ROCZEN (94) |
| 37 | MaxBIAGGI3 | 20 points 1. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) 2. Ken ROCZEN (94) 3. Joel ROELANTS (34) |
| 38 −2▼ | fallais | 20 points 1. Ken ROCZEN (94) 2. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 3. Jeffrey HERLINGS (111) |
| 39 −3▼ | dess72 | 13 points 1. Ken ROCZEN (94) 2. Marvin MUSQUIN (1) 3. Steven FROSSARD (183) |
| 💥 | olivgur | 8 points 1. Jeremy VAN HOREBEEK (89) 2. Christophe CHARLIER (430) 3. Arnaud TONUS (23) |
Ordre fonction du nombre de points marqués puis de l'ancienneté du pronostic.